Find us on Linkedin
Receive insights from Traverse
Subscribe below
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Other Parts of This Article

This is part 3 of 3 in finding high IRR hydropower sites with an aggressive tariff using HydroDesk. Please feel free to jump to the other parts below:

Part 3 - Techno-Financial Modelling

Wrong Defaults

When we first arrive at the optimize page, the Equity IRR is way too high. This is because HydroDesk has a number of reasonable defaults across the board. We have to fix some of them to fit our context.

img 032

Wrong Tariff

This is because the default tariff we have set is 12 cents for the first 8 years and 8 cents for the next 12. Let’s change this to a flat 5 cents.

img 033

The E-IRR has dropped all the way to 12.15%! Where did we go wrong?!

Wrong Design Flow

Before panicking, we realize we have not changed the default design flow Qd yet. Currently the turbine is oversized. Let’s take a look at Design Flow Optimization:

img 034

The optimal design flow is at 25.7 m3/s - however, to achieve a 40MW plant, we need about 30m3/s. Lets change it on the Power Generation tab:

img 035

Once we run this, our Equity IRR is now at 15.96%. This is still not enough and far from our 20% target! At the very least, our Project IRR should be >15% so that we are not at the absolute mercy of the banks later on.

img 036
Design Flow Sidebar If you are wondering how we can just arbitrarily change design flow and get a 3% bump: design flow dictates how big the turbine is. Water in a river flows at different volumes at different times of the year. If you install a large turbine (large design flow), it could mean you don't intend to run it at all during the summer - thus leading to a low capacity factor. If you install a very small turbine, it means you intend to operate it all the time. The size of the turbine affects everything before it, the penstock, the water canal, the excavation required, the construction complexity etc. Based on the curve of the water flow throughout the seasons and the given tariff structure, there is an optimal peak IRR. This process is called Design Flow Optimization. HydroDesk has a series of algorithms that do all of this!

Wrong Electro-Mechanical Equipment Price

HydroDesk’s default cost for M&E equipment (CIF) is $600/kW - this is on the higher side and is usually applicable for smaller plants. Mid size plants like ours at 40MW should be able to get slightly better economies of scale and competitive quotes. You can view the unit costs under the Bill of Quantities page and edit it there directly. We are going to drop it to $450/kW directly:

img 037

Assuming the procurement team comes through for us, our IRR is now back at 18.83% which is 1.2% shy of our target.

Tax Incentives?

On the non-technical side, is there any possibility of a tax benefit of some kind? Our default is a flat 25% corporate tax with no industrial incentives. Renewables have no fuel costs, so depreciation and tax heavily impact returns. Its even worse because as a base load plant, almost all revenue === profit! If we can achieve a net 20% tax rate:

img 038

Nice! Our E-IRR is now at 19.7%! Lets hope that if the offtaker cannot move on the tariff at 5 cents, the state can help us out somehow:

Linear Structures

Let’s say we want to push the last 0.3% to hit 20%. The last tweak we are going to perform is to change our Covered channel to an Uncovered channel. At this point, this is probably not advisable. The bank slopes are not flat and over 20 years, there will definitely be operational issues surrounding land slides. A covered channel provides opportunity to “lightly bake” the canal into the mountainside providing better geotechnical stability. An uncovered channel needs an open air surface.

We can do this on the Linear Structures tab. Linear Structures mean anything that can be described as a line such as roads, canals, transmission lines etc.

img 040

Now our Equity IRR is 20.67%:

img 041


Just for fun, lets see what happens when we change our tariff to say 9 cents:

img 042
img 043

Project Summary


This concludes our three part series on designing a hydropower project based on a somewhat aggressive tariff. In Part 3 we:

  • tweaked the tariff
  • optimized the design flow
  • changed the electro-mechanical equipment price (turbines)
  • gave ourselves a small tax break
  • changed our covered channel to an uncovered channel

Disclaimer: Any resemblance to any schemes or projects under development in the particular area used in this post is entirely a coincidence.

Subscribe to our newsletter today

Enjoyed this post? Receive the next one in your inbox!

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.